Smirnoff’s Maxine LaQueene Is Transsexual Prostitute

There is follow-up on Maxine LaQueene, erstwhile representative of Smirnoff vodka, who had to be detained by police for his behavior at the Texas Capitol while protesting against bills to protect children from grooming by his fellow drag queens. Via Post Millennial:

The drag queen who uses she/her pronouns was forcibly removed by police after he flashed his testicles and rear end in front of legislators, women, and teens present in the state House chamber. Now the trans children’s rights activist has been unmasked for promoting shocking fetish videos online in addition to working illegally as a sex worker, a Class B Misdemeanour in the state.

LaQueene, a biological male, who identifies as a trans woman, was advertising sexual services on a trans prostitution website for $200 an hour, describing himself as “Mistress Maxine…a 6’4 trans mistress…available for dates, girlfriend experiences, hotel meetings and more.” Additionally, he proudly shows off extreme fetishes on his Twitter account, which he uses for trans activism, as well as on his OnlyFans.

Not only a drag queen, but an LGBT activist. Not only an LGBT activist, but a sex worker. No wonder the suits at Smirnoff wanted his face on their vodka.

Despite claiming to be a trans kids advocate, the drag queen posts photos of his uncensored penis with captions like “RT if you can deepthroat it” to Twitter, whilst posting extreme fetish videos on his OnlyFans account with his boyfriend who identifies as a ‘dog,’ wearing a leather fetish dog mask.

He ought to apply for a job in Biden’s Department of Energy, now that fellow dog master Sam Brinton has left his position.

To the extent liberals are winning the culture war, Mr LaQueene personifies American culture.

On a tip from Barry A.

Maxine LaQueene, Transsexual Face of Smirnoff Vodka

If you find that lousy beer goes down better when associated with a female impersonator, you might also like to try lousy vodka:

Several recent Instagram posts from drag queen and trans woman “Maxine LaQueene” featured the official “Paid Partnership with Smirnoff” tags, denoting that the major liquor retailer has hired the biological male for promotional material.

Vodka isn’t all that Mr LaQueene promotes. There is also the Agenda:

In addition to being a promoter of drag and transgenderism, LaQueene is an outspoken LGBTQ activist who had recently been removed from the Texas state capitol building by police for disrupting a legislature vote on a trans bill.

The bill he was objecting to (Senate Bill 14) was drafted to “ban gender surgeries or other sex reassignment procedures being performed on children.” No one less evil than Josef Mengele would oppose the bill.

Having watched the carnage at Anheuser-Busch, Smirnoff is now keeping Mr LaQueene at arm’s length:

Smirnoff has denied having any current working relationship with LaQueene. In an email to Fox News Digital, a representative said LaQueene “is not currently a Smirnoff partner, and does not currently have any contract with Smirnoff.” LaQueen, the representative said, was one of the participants in a promotional campaign in the fall of 2022 but not now in 2023.

That they do not belligerently endorse him while denouncing their customers as bigots, transphobes, et cetera for not liking it is evidence that the Bud Light boycott is working and must be continued, lest they think the consumer rebellion against LGBTism is a temporary squall that can be ignored because it will blow over.

Unless this guy makes you thirsty, drink some other brand of vodka. There are plenty to chose from.

On a tip from Steve T.

Woke Kroger Goes Out of Its Way to Inflict Moonbattery

The targeted boycott against Anheuser-Busch for contemptuously ramming LGBTism down its customers throats has been working beautifully so far. Too bad obnoxious wokeism is too prevalent in the corporate world for it to be feasible to boycott everyone who deserves it. However, if a company goes out of its way to poke you in the eye, it makes sense to look for alternatives. Kroger comes to mind:

A nonprofit law firm is taking legal action against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging that the government agency illegally ignored Kroger shareholders who tried to protect employees from discrimination based on political ideology.

Needless to say, no company discriminates against employees for holding viewpoints favored by leftists. Intolerance only cuts one way in this country.

In December, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., scolded Kroger Chair and CEO Rodney McMullen for the company’s “woke” policies, noting the company paid $180,000 to settle a lawsuit filed by two former employees in Arkansas who claimed they were fired for refusing to wear aprons celebrating the LGBTQ+ community.

That’s not all:

Previously, Kroger provoked outrage from conservatives and patriotic customers when it recalled pro-American items from its shelves.

Additionally, Kroger announced that it will pay for travel expenses associated with having an out-of-state abortion, following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision.

Kroger companies include: Baker’s, City Market, Dillons, Food 4 Less, Foods Co, Fred Meyer, Fry’s, Gerbes, Jay C Food Store, King Soopers, Kroger, Mariano’s, Metro Market, Pay-Less Super Markets, Pick’n Save, QFC, Ralphs, Ruler, and Smith’s Food and Drug.

The progressives running Kroger have made it clear where they stand. Customers who can find a suitable alternative should make it clear where they stand as well.

On a tip from Marty.

How Much Bud Light Deserves to Be Boycotted

The boycott of Bud Light may seem trivial to some, but to countermoonbats it is crucial. Matt Walsh laid out the strategy:

Actually, it does matter which target. Bud Light is ideal because Anheuser-Busch obnoxiously rammed moonbattery down its customers’ throats out of explicit contempt for those very customers, and because the brand depends heavily on sales to regular guys, the demographic woke corporations most vehemently hate.

We don’t have to let AB InBev spit in our faces. We can punch back so that it hurts. But only if we follow through by maintaining the boycott indefinitely.

Donald Trump Jr. has issued an unhelpful statement claiming that grinding Dylan Mulvaney in our face is out of character for Budweiser:

Don Jr. is misinformed — to put it mildly:

When Pride parades and other LGBT events started to gain steam in the 1990s, “Bud Light was the brand,” a 35-year veteran of Anheuser-Busch told National Review.

Bud Light has been the brand to bend over backward for all things LGBT ever since.

In the mid 1990s, he said, Bud Light hired an “alternative lifestyle” brand manager.

“Alternative” specifically means LGBT. The position was maintained for decades.

In 1993, a Bud Light TV commercial titled “Ladies Night” featured four men dressed in drag visiting a bar and ordering the beer. Two years later, Bud Light launched a campaign promoting acceptance of the LGBT community that stated, “Labels belong on beer not on people.” Bud Light teamed up with GLAAD, an organization fighting gay, lesbian, and transgender defamation in 1998. Their relationship is still going strong today.

GLAAD is a militant homosexual activist group infamous for targeting children.

“Bud Light has long been a staunch supporter of the LGBT community,” Sarah Kate Ellis, GLAAD president and CEO, said in 2016 after Bud Light debuted an ad including a same-sex wedding. “This spot is the latest in a long line of inclusive advertising that will help increase understanding and accelerate LGBT acceptance. GLAAD has been honored to partner with Bud Light for 18 years.”

Money spent on Bud Light has actually funded GLAAD’s sick activities.

In 2019, Bud Light unveiled a GLAAD-crossover rainbow aluminum bottle to celebrate World Pride. Bud Light pledged to donate $1 to the nonprofit for every case sold in June, which is Pride Month.

You don’t get gayer than Bud Light, even if it isn’t gays who drink it.

Speaking of targeting kids, the parent company used the nonalcoholic malt energy drink Pony Malta to promote homosexuality to children in South America.

The company has also provided legal and financial support to encourage employees to change their names to signify they are transgender.

Anheuser-Busch finally broke social media silence and was ratioed deservedly. CEO Brendan Whitworth (presumably no relation to foiled transsexual mass murderer William Whitworth) has belatedly issued a buzzword-choked non-apology that alienates everyone by trying not to alienate anyone. It is too late to pretend they are neutral in the culture war.

No one deserves boycotting more than Bud Light and its parent company. Make sure to hit AB InBev’s other brands too and do not let up ever.

Mark Dice responds to Don Jr.

On tips from Varla, Mr. Freemarket, ABC of the ANC, and KirklesWorth.

Paid Time Off for Being Transsexual

So eager are woke corporations to advance the LGBT agenda that Suncorp Group offers time off work to encourage employees to become transsexual:

The company, which is involved in insurance and banking in Australia and New Zealand, is offering six weeks of paid leave and 12 months of unpaid leave for people to “affirm their gender,” an Orwellian phrase that actually entails the exact opposite of affirming an individual’s immutable biological sex.

You don’t actually have to cut off body parts to get time off work. Just publicly commit yourself to sexually perverted gender psychosis:

Suncorp notes that the transition process can include actions ranging from hormones, surgery, and recovery, to simply informing others about the gender switch and changing clothing style and pronouns.

Systematically encourage something and you get more of it. This includes insanity — with predictable results.

On a tip from Wiggins.

Mulvaney Pushback Has Cost Anheuser-Busch $6 Billion

We do not have to passively accept corporations ramming disgusting moonbattery down our throats. We can push back. The boycott of Bud Light in response to parent company AB InBev shoving the repulsive Dylan Mulvaney in our faces proves it:

Bud Light’s parent company has lost more than $6billion in market capitalization since announcing its partnership with a polarizing transgender internet personality. …

Currently at $125.73billion, the company’s market capitalization six days ago stood at $132.38 billion, as brass continue to stand by their deal with Mulvaney – an outspoken activist who has more than 10million followers on social media.

If anyone deserves a $6 billion kick in the teeth, it is Anheuser-Busch, for despising its own customer base.

Despite suggestions that top brass is unhappy with the Dylan Mulvaney debacle, showcasing the creep appears to be consistent with the prevailing mentality:

Anheuser-Busch’s vice president of communications Jennifer Morris, who locked her Twitter account in recent days, said at an industry event in 2021 that she felt it was important to “leverage our scale and resources to further conversations around DE&I [Diversity, Equity and Inclusion] and help consumers understand the difference they can make as individuals.”

Then there is the gratingly woke Alissa Gordon Heinerscheid, VP of marketing for Bud Light, who wanted to “evolve and elevate” the brand by appealing to a totally different customer base that would not be regarded as icky by Harvard types like herself.

We can’t boycott every corporation run by people who hate us, because these days they all are. But we can teach them respect by making an example of Bud Light — so long as we never back down. Once the boycott ends, it will be back to business as usual.

Already the boycott has forced liberal elitists to retreat into their inner sanctum of willful stupidity:

There is no reason to believe that the child-grooming sexual deviant Chasten Buttigieg is any brighter than his dopey “husband” Pete, but even he probably understands that the point isn’t that perverts drink Bud Light. The point is that perverts do not drink Bud Light, but that’s who Anheuser-Busch markets to anyway, in open contempt for its actual (hopefully former) customers.

Note that “civil rights” now means promoting female impersonators. That is, the term has no meaning at all. Like Bud Light, it has been poisoned by moonbattery and is no longer of any use except to moonbats.

On tips from Chris Neilson, Mr. Freemarket, seaoh, Jester, and Ed McAninch.

Bud Light Boycott Update

The boycott of Anheuser-Busch products in general and Bud Light in particular is crucial to prove there are limits to what LGBT militants can bully corporations into ramming down our throats. Fortunately, it has been going well:

A viral tweet, which has amassed over 4.4 million views and 88,000 likes, is one such example of the hurdles that Anheuser-Busch could now be facing in its post-Mulvaney landscape.

Twitter user @Floridagirl0850 announced: “We just refused our #Budlight orders for my liquor store. We are pulling it from our shelves. We are not the only ones according to our reps. They said it’s bad.”

Responses to the tweet suggest massive support, to the chagrin of leftist social engineers who are accustomed to calling all the shots.

This battle will not be over quickly. At Anheuser-Busch, poking its customers in the eye on behalf of the LGBT community was part of a deliberate marketing strategy:

Shortly before Bud Light was besieged by the Dylan Mulvaney controversy, the beer company’s vice president stressed the need to get away from the “out of touch” frat boy image to one of “inclusivity.”

Alissa Gordon Heinerscheid, the self-proclaimed “first female to lead the largest beer brand in the industry,” shared her disdain for Bud Light’s previous frat boy image during a recent podcast.

That is, her disdain for the brand’s customers, who will now be excluded in the name of inclusion.

Heinerscheid stressed a need to “evolve and elevate” the Bud Light brand.

“What does evolve and elevate mean? It means inclusivity,” Heinerscheid declared. “It means shifting the tone. It means having a campaign that’s truly inclusive and feels lighter and brighter and different. And appeals to women and to men. And representation is sort of the heart of revolution.”

As moonbats say, “The issue is never the issue. This issue is always the revolution.”

We’ll see whether revolutionary leftist ideology applies to selling beer. Maybe normal people don’t count any more, so Anheuser-Busch can focus exclusively on transsexuals and Heinerscheid’s fellow Harvard English majors. Or maybe this will blow up in their face so hard that other companies take notice.

It all depends on how long countermoonbats can go without buying Bud Light, Budweiser, and related brands. Forever should be easy.

Remember, if you drink Bud Light, this could happen to you:

On tips from Anonymous, Blackjack, Lyle, and Mr. Freemarket.

Bud Light Blood in the Water

“Go woke, go broke” sounds good, but it isn’t working that way, because virtually all corporations are aggressively left-wing now and countermoonbats can’t boycott all of them. Radical leftists have made it clear than every enterprise is either with them or against them; companies have less to fear by being with them due to the relentless vindictiveness that characterizes progressives.

Matt Walsh offers a solution:

Who’s up first? Bud Light grinding the transsexual agenda in the face of customers who are overwhelming unlikely to like it makes Anheuser-Busch an obvious candidate.

Celebrities Kid Rock, Travis Tritt, and John Rich have already stood up to the woke lynch mob by expressing their disgust at Anheuser-Busch plastering female impersonator Dylan Mulvaney’s creepy face across beer cans to advance the LGBT agenda. A boycott is picking up steam:

Already the corporate clowns at Anheuser-Busch and Belgian parent company AB InBev have noticed the pushback:

Public outrage continues to grow over Bud Light’s partnership with a controversial transgender activist, and now, representatives from Budweiser have canceled an event featuring Budweiser’s iconic Clydesdale horses.

The Clydesdales were scheduled to appear at several events in Springfield, Missouri, sometime this week to help promote the Budweiser brand. …

According to a statement from Anheuser-Busch, Wil Fischer Companies, a Budweiser distributor in Missouri, elected to cancel the Springfield events “due to safety concerns for their employees.” The company did not elaborate on why Wil Fischer employees might be imperiled or whether the events would be rescheduled at a later date.

When they feel threatened, liberals reflexively pretend to be physically endangered so they can pose as victims. Recall that the White House reacted to a transgender terror attack on a Christian school in Nashville by lying that there is an “epidemic of violence against trans people.”

No one is calling for violence against Anheuser-Busch employees. The call is to drink any other brand of beer.

Already they are running scared. If you boycott one product in your life, make it Bud Light, Budweiser, and associated brands — and keep it up.

On tips from Mr. Freemarket and ABC of the ANC.