Dems Rally Around Martyr Al Green

Posted on by

Troglodyte congresscritter Al Green is a martyr among his peers, having received a wrist slap for his juvenile behavior during Trump’s triumphant speech.

Via Fox News:

The 77-year-old Democrat was removed from Trump’s joint address to Congress on Tuesday night after repeatedly disrupting the beginning of the president’s speech.

He shouted, “You have no mandate!” at Trump as he touted Republican victories in the House, Senate and White House.

Consequently, the House voted to censure him.

Ten Democrats joined Republicans in voting for the measure.

Democrats had to win 215 districts to produce these 10 adults.

Before the formal censure could be read out to Green, however, Democrats upended House floor proceedings by gathering with the Texas Democrat and singing “We Shall Overcome.” Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., was forced to call the House into a recess after failing multiple times to quell the protest.

It isn’t easy to preside over Congress when a significant contingent consists of spoilt children:

The song “We Shall Overcome” is associated with the civil rights movement, which as the video above demonstrates has collapsed into farce.

On a tip from Wiggins.

Moonbattery Applied to Toxicology

Posted on by

The observation that pollutants known as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) interfere with hormones to produce unnatural sexual effects in frogs is thoughtcrime, because it stigmatizes people who exhibit analogous characteristics. A moonbat leaps forward to raise the alarm:

Scientists studying the effects of EDCs on frogs widely reported that individual frogs exposed to these chemicals displayed same-sex sexual behavior, exhibited both female- and male-marked phenotypes, and tadpoles changed sex during development, resulting in what researchers and journalists variously called “gay,” “intersex,” or “transgender” frogs (with “sad sex lives” to boot). Queerness was thus characterized as a bad outcome of toxic exposure…

Queerness must always be framed as good, because making it ubiquitous is an objective of liberal social engineers.

The scientific elites who codified toxicology occupied particular gender-, race-, and class-privileged social locations, positions that empowered them to grant themselves the authority to define what makes a toxicant safe…

I show that despite toxicologists’ best intentions, toxicology’s inherent biases undermine the usefulness of toxicological findings for environmental justice struggles by focusing on the environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology of EDCs, which is the sub-field fretting about feminized frogs.

With moonbats, the issue is never the issue; the issue is always moonbattery. The point here is not to keep people and animals safe from toxins. It is “environmental justice.”

Anything that does not advance the liberal agenda is “violence.” This includes toxicology:

The violent histories that EDC research unwittingly recites by deploying such terms as “demasculinization” and “chemical castration” is a form of violence in and of itself. By assuming and perpetuating the white supremacist and heteropatriarchal ideologies that queer, transgender, intersex, neurodivergent, and disabled bodies are somehow aberrant (read: abhorrent), the work of prominent EDC researchers and anti-toxics advocates reinforces social stigma as well as judicial, material, and biomedical inequity.

Stigma can be reduced through Critical Toxicity Studies:

Critical Toxicity Studies calls for a queer, ecofeminist study of toxicants that explicitly, carefully situates toxicants in their sociohistorical contexts, while simultaneously prefiguring a world where all bodies and identities—whether female, male, trans, intersex, disabled, queer, melanated, more-than-human, microbial, weedy, fungal, fishy, fat, young, old, sick, and so on—are fiercely, generously, handled with care.

If progressivism prevails, toxicologists will be replaced by wokesters with PhDs in Critical Toxicity Studies, who will righteously affirm the LGBT identity of chemically deformed frogs.

On a tip from Mike B.

Jasmine Crockett Response to Trump Speech

Posted on by

Rather than having the dull Elissa Slotkin recite tired talking points, Democrats should have picked Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) to deliver their response to Trump’s grand slam of a speech before a joint session of Congress on Tuesday. As MSNBC demonstrates, clueless hebephrenic sputtering resonates with their base. In case kids were watching, it would require a LANGUAGE ALERT:

The Blaze reports:

Crockett was speaking to progressive news media outlet MeidasTouch from Congress on Wednesday when she erupted in a vulgar attack on recent Trump policies.

Congresscritter Crockett expressed her inability to comprehend Trump’s America First policies and raved:

“What is happening? Like, this is not America! This is a terrible nightmare! Somebody slap me and wake me the f**k up, ‘cuz I’m ready to get on with it!”

To answer her question, what is happening is that America is coming back after a dark period of self-inflicted decline under liberal domination. Small surprise that Democrats don’t recognize their own country. Its return is not a nightmare but real.

More than a slap would be required to snap Crockett & Co. out of their delusions.

On a tip from Wiggins.

Hijabs: The Future of Female Fashion

Posted on by

The future of women’s fashion is easy to predict, assuming the progressives in charge continue to be successful at displacing the native population of Europe. Invest in any company that makes hijabs.

Via Allah’s Willing Executioners:

A woman was racially insulted on the underground in Berlin’s Mitte district on Sunday afternoon. …

There she was insulted as a prostitute in Arabic by an unknown man. The perpetrator asked her in broken German why she wasn’t wearing a headscarf…

The multicultural enricher “threatened to seriously injure her if he saw her again.”

Meanwhile, in Britainistan:

Possessing photos of a Muslim woman without her hijab should be made a criminal offence, MPs have proposed. …

Such photographs should be treated the same as child sex abuse images, possession of which can carry long prison sentences, the MPs said.

This is just wrong. Women without hijabs are much more serious than child sex abuse, if we are to judge by current practices in Afghanistan and by Mohammad himself.

The proposals will deepen concerns that Islam is poised to win legal protections which are not afforded to other religions under British law.

That’s why they call Airstrip One’s ruler Two-Tier Keir.

On a tip from Steve T.

Vintage Moonbattery: Bodycams Are Racist

Posted on by

High on their own supply, moonbats once liked the idea of forcing police to wear bodycams, so that the media could run with video evidence of racist oppression. But as usual, reality failed to conform to liberal ideology, forcing a change of position. Check out this 2017 headline from Newsweek:

Police Body Cameras Can Threaten Civil Rights of Black and Brown People, New Report Says

Anyone tempted to ask, “What about the civil rights of white people?” is a racist who needs to report to the mainstream media for reeducation.

On a tip from Bluto.

Dems Overindulge in Projection During Trump Speech

Posted on by

“Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty” is a strategy that has been around for generations. Democrats push it to the point of self-parody, and never more so than during their back-firing attempts to undermine Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress last night.

Elon Musk has hindered their systematic theft of many $billions of our money by shining a light on it with DOGE. With the other hand still in the cookie jar, Democrats react by holding up ping-pong paddles proclaiming that it is Musk who steals:

The party that promotes sex change procedures for children and that just defied 79% of the public by blocking a bill that would prevent males from competing in sports as females announces that Trump is not normal:

Meanwhile, Democrat congressman Tim “Sarah” McBride attended the event disguised as a woman.

The natural — or should I say unnatural — tendency of Democrats is to invert reality into its diametric opposite. That’s how they came up with their beloved term, “gender-affirming care.”

Here’s “normal” as redefined by Democrats:

Hat tip: Modernity.

Germany Uses Stasi Tactic Against Thoughtcrime

Posted on by

East Germany was infamous for relying on informants to impose absolute tyranny, even turning relatives against each other. The tradition continues:

Germany’s Interior Ministry, headed by Nancy Faeser – known for banning media outlets – and the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women, and Youth have launched a project dubbed, “Advice Compass on Conspiracy Thinking.”

The center is there to provide advice to anyone who “suspect[s] their friends or family members have fallen victim to conspiracy theories,” according to the Interior Ministry.

A “conspiracy theory” can be defined as an unproven theory regarding current events that does not meet with the approval of the authorities. Often, the difference between a conspiracy theory and confirmed truth is a matter of weeks. The Great Replacement is still regarded as a conspiracy theory among leftists, even as they effectively acknowledge it.

As serious as the matter is, hilariously enough, the German word for “advice” happens to be – “rat.”

“Holistic” is how Faeser chose to describe this approach and the inclusion of the “advice” center into Germany’s overall fight against what the authorities consider to be extremism and disinformation.

“Holistic” is a euphemism for “totalitarian.”

In Munich recently, JD Vance tried to warn Germans (and Britons) where this is heading. Many Germans pushed back against the increasingly hostile and authoritarian left-wing ruling class in last month’s election by voting AfD. But the leftist uniparty blocked AfD from taking part in the governing coalition.

On a tip from Brian Brandt.