Reaction to Georgia Confirms Democrats Rely on Fraud

The emphasis placed on HR1, which would institutionalize voter fraud, has demonstrated that the Democrat Party relies heavily on cheating. The ruling party’s reaction to a Georgia law that tightens up a little of the sloppiness that characterized the 2020 election confirms it.

Democrats don’t merely oppose this law, which leaves swing state Georgia with looser restrictions than some solid blue states (e.g., New York, New Jersey, Joe Biden’s Delaware, etc.). They have gone nuclear, leaning heavily on corporations to back up their mendacious propaganda campaign against the law.

They didn’t have to twist arms hard at Major League Baseball, which is run by like-minded leftists, as its response to Black Lives Matter rioting made obvious.

Announces MLB:

Major League Baseball announced on Friday that it will relocate the 2021 All-Star Game and MLB Draft, originally scheduled to take place in Atlanta, to a to-be-determined location.

The decision comes a little more than a week after the passage of S.B. 202, a Georgia law that President Joe Biden criticized earlier this week, saying that it will restrict voting access for residents of the state.

On the contrary, the bill does not restrict voting access. It tries to cut down on fraud. Being asked to provide ID does not restrict voting access in any meaningful sense, nor is it remotely racist. But since the racism club works, that’s what the liberal establishment is beating Georgia with.

The MLB announcement goes on at length, self-righteously combatting imaginary racial oppression by helping the Democrat Party defend voter fraud. If you haven’t sworn off professional baseball yet, read it and you likely will.

Based on brazen lies told by Biden and the liberal media, allowing election fraud is presented as a civil rights issue — and yet:

Can they explain for us why they recently held a ball game in [the] brutal totalitarian military dictatorship of Cuba? … Can they explain to us why they hold a training camp in China, home of the Uighur slave-labor laogai and the broken-treaty de-democratization of Hong Kong?

The explanation is simple: this is not about civil rights. If anything, the Georgia law upholds civil rights by trying to prevent the cancelation of legitimate votes through fraud.

The entire issue is a power grab by the Democrat Party.

Corporations are scrambling to get in the good graces of a party that will exert a totalitarian level of control after it uses election fraud to cement single-party status. This is conspicuous in the case of Delta Airlines, which had praised the bill, but then turned against it afterward, evidently buckling to pressure from the Biden Regime.

The USA is becoming a country in which you cannot do business unless you are in the good graces of the Democrat Party. That is the point of the never-ending subsidies and regulations.

In most major cities and the entire state of California, Democrats have effectively already achieved single-party rule. Not nationally though. There has been some pushback from Senators Mike Lee (R-UT) and Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Rep Jeff Duncan (R-SC), who question MLB’s federal antitrust exemption:

“Why does @MLB still have antitrust immunity?” Lee tweeted. “It’s time for the federal government to stop granting special privileges to specific, favored corporations—especially those that punish their political opponents.”

However, privileges will continue to flow to the politically compliant so long as the Democrat Party rules by decree, ramming through legislation with zero support from Republicans.

The belligerent manner in which Democrats have imposed radical legislation and executive orders as if opposition did not exist indicates that they believe election fraud will protect them from the wrath of the population.

On tips from Varla, Bluto, Mr. Freemarket, and ABC of the ANC.

Did Zuckerberg Buy Wisconsin for Biden?

For Democrats, the great thing about the Capitol Riot is not so much that it allowed them to demonize their opposition and place DC under military occupation, as that it put all discussion of election fraud beyond the pale. Anyone who has dared raise the issue is lumped in with the Buffalo Guy and denounced as an insurrectionist who belongs behind bars. Nonetheless, the 2020 election was riddled with irregularities, some of which were financed by the same Big Tech oligarchs who suppressed speech that would have undermined Biden’s prospects.

Zillionaire leftist Mark Zuckerberg could be emerging as the next George Soros. Last year, he passed out hundreds of $millions to “protect American elections.” To “protect” in this context means to ensure Democrats win. What Facebook’s “fact checkers” are to objective reality, a “fair election” group funded by Zuckerberg is to election integrity.

Money buys power. The Daily Signal reports on how some of Zuckerberg’s power was applied in Wisconsin, where Biden officially won by a whisker, 49.6% to 48.9%.

In the city of Green Bay, which received a total of $1.6 million in grant funding from the Zuckerberg-funded Center for Tech and Civic Life, a “grant mentor” who has worked for several Democratic Party candidates, was given access to boxes of absentee ballots before the election.

Despite the liberal establishment’s pointed disinterest in this topic, emails have surfaced revealing that the election was compromised.

The emails show Green Bay’s highly partisan Mayor Eric Genrich, a Democrat, and his staff usurping City Clerk Kris Teske’s authority and letting the Zuckerberg-funded “grant team” take over—a clear violation of Wisconsin election statutes, say election law experts.

According to state law, municipal clerks administer elections. However, having been marginalized by the mayor’s office, Teske ended up stepping down, effectively leaving the election in the hands of Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein, Wisconsin state leader for the National Vote at Home Institute.

Spitzer-Rubenstein, who was tapped as point man for his organization’s efforts in Wisconsin, has a history of working for Democratic campaigns, according to his resume. In 2012, he interned for Melissa Mark-Viverito, a “fiercely liberal” Democrat and former speaker of the New York City Council.

Spitzer-Rubenstein sought to assist Green Bay elections officials correct or “cure” absentee ballots returned to the city clerk.

You can imagine what “cure” might mean in this context.

Spitzer-Rubenstein was given the keys to the room where the absentee ballots were stored. … The city of Green Bay literally gave the keys to the election to a Democratic Party operative from New York.

Green Bay is merely one example among many.

In July, the Center for Tech and Civic Life announced it was awarding grants totaling $6.3 million to the state’s five largest cities. Green Bay received nearly $1.1 million, and then picked up another half-million dollars in a supplemental grant.

This is a drop in the bucket to a plutocrat like Zuckerberg.

The grants were thanks to the $250 million “gift” from the CEO of Facebook, the social network giant that has silenced conservative speech. Zuckerberg would drop another $100 million on his “safe elections” agenda before the pivotal November presidential election.

As a Founding Father of progressivism observed,

“It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.”

If the Democrats manage to push HR1 across the finish line, the USA has had its last free and fair election. Then every election can be decided by liberal oligarchs like Zuckerberg behind the scenes before a vote is ever cast.

On a tip from Lyle.

HR1/S1 Will Reduce American Elections to Farce

As mentioned earlier, today’s Democrats do not plan to relinquish power once they have gotten their hands on it. As also mentioned earlier, if you like the mess they made of the 2020 election, you will love what they plan to inflict with House bill HR1 and its companion Senate bill S1.

Former Justice Department lawyer J. Christian Adams sums up just how much damage Democrats plan to inflict on the American electoral system:

They are named H.R.1 and S.1 for a reason. The bills are the top priority of the newly empowered Democrats in Congress.

No more registering to vote. Ballots will be mailed out automatically to addresses generated by the bloated and incompetent federal bureaucracy. Excess ballots will be sent all over the place.

States also would be blocked by H.R.1 from signature verification procedures.

You say it is unconstitutional to deny states the right to run elections? No worries:

H.R.1 rigs the system for any lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the law. All lawsuits can only be filed in one court – federal court in the District of Columbia.

Clearing dead people off the rolls would not benefit the Democratic Party, so:

It prohibits states from conducting list maintenance on the voter rolls.

You need ID for everything else, but after Biden signs this bill, requiring it for voting will be abolished by federal law.

The power grab goes beyond blatantly encouraging and facilitating fraud. It lays the groundwork to disenfranchise states that vote the wrong way:

“Congress can reduce a state’s representation in Congress when the right to vote is denied.” Without qualification or definition, Congress could rely on this sentence unilaterally to cut the number of House members from any state it claims is denying the right to vote.

Similar phony claims are already common. Democrats often use them to deflect investigations into voter fraud. If HR1/S1 passes, investigating voter fraud might get you thrown in jail:

It criminalizes anyone who uses state challenge laws to question the eligibility of registrants wrongly. The penalty is up to one year in prison per instance.

The power grab unsurprisingly encroaches on free speech:

It criminalizes publishing “false statements” about qualifications to vote and “false statements” about which groups have endorsed which candidates.

If making what the authorities determine is a “false statement” about an election can get you thrown in jail, there is a good chance that the election is a charade and that you do not live in a free country.

The bill does away with election day:

Nationwide, states must accept mail ballots on Election Day plus 10 days later.

Al Franken and more recently Joe Biden can tell you how valuable it is to be able to keep counting votes until you get the desired result.

And of course, unlimited ballot harvesting — having a third party “help” to fill in and gather up ballots, then drop them off at a polling station or other designated station — is guaranteed.

If this abomination is imposed, America will officially become a single-party banana republic. Elections will be taken no more seriously than they are in Venezuela.

On a tip from ABC of the ANC.

Time Magazine Describes Cabal That Rigged 2020 Election

Leftist totalitarians are convinced that they have it all wrapped up now. They are not worried about backlash, future elections, protests, dissidents, or anything else. If they didn’t think the game is over, Time Magazine — the flagship magazine of the liberal establishment — would not run a nearly 7,000-word piece detailing the left-wing cabal that ensured Biden would win the 2020 election.

As noted at Breitbart,

The New York Times had reported on the effort in January, referring to the “Democracy Defense Coalition.” The Daily Beast hinted at it in the fall. But the Time article is the most in-depth report at what others suggested was going on behind the scenes.

The piece, written by Molly Ball, is entitled “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election.” It is written from the point of view of those who seized power, but it is easy enough to unspin it, although occasional translations into plain English are provided below for the reader’s convenience:

Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time.

“Voter suppression” refers to attempts to impede election fraud. Voting by mail is notoriously prone to election fraud.

They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears.

“Disinformation” and “smears” are references to facts and opinions that might detract from Biden’s election effort. For example, when the New York Post broke a bombshell story right before the election that implicated Biden in influence peddling to our communist Chinese enemies, Facebook restricted access to it, and Twitter went still further, actually locking the account of America’s oldest continuously published newspaper. Despite being denounced as “disinformation” by the liberal establishment, the NY Post story turned out to be true.

They executed national public-awareness campaigns that helped Americans understand how the vote count would unfold over days or weeks, preventing Trump’s conspiracy theories and false claims of victory from getting more traction.

“Public-awareness campaign” means “propaganda barrage.” Regarding conspiracy theories, Ball admits that Trump was right regarding his suspicion of an “an orchestrated effort to anoint the winner, even while many key states were still being counted.”

Ball also admits that this story…

…sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.

However, the fever dream turns out to be real.

The mastermind of the plot was Mike Podhorzer, senior adviser to the president of the AFL-CIO. Where corruption and leftism intersect, there you find Big Unions.

Podhorzer began working from his laptop at his kitchen table, holding back-to-back Zoom meetings for hours a day with his network of contacts across the progressive universe: the labor movement; the institutional left, like Planned Parenthood and Greenpeace; resistance groups like Indivisible and MoveOn; progressive data geeks and strategists, representatives of donors and foundations, state-level grassroots organizers, racial-justice activists and others.

In other words, he brought together many factions of the radical Left.

Protecting the election would require an effort of unprecedented scale. As 2020 progressed, it stretched to Congress, Silicon Valley and the nation’s statehouses.

“Protecting” means “winning by any means necessary.”

The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative chipped in $300 million.

CZI is owned by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan.

Laura Quinn, a veteran progressive operative … piloted a nameless, secret project, which she has never before publicly discussed, that tracked disinformation online and tried to figure out how to combat it.

Quinn found that it is ineffective to counter “disinformation” with rational argument; that just draws attention to facts you don’t want people to know about.

The solution, she concluded, was to pressure platforms to enforce their rules, both by removing content or accounts that spread disinformation and by more aggressively policing…

Enforcement of these vague rules was on a conspicuously selective basis.

In November 2019, Mark Zuckerberg invited nine civil rights leaders to dinner at his home, where they warned him about the danger of the election-related falsehoods that were already spreading unchecked. “It took pushing, urging, conversations, brainstorming, all of that to get to a place where we ended up with more rigorous rules and enforcement,” says Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, who attended the dinner and also met with Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and others. (Gupta has been nominated for Associate Attorney General by President Biden.)

A woman who took a leadership role in suppressing information prior to the election will be working at a high level in the Justice Department. The next election won’t be any cleaner.

But then, Time wouldn’t be admitting the election was essentially rigged if the ruling oligarchy were not confident that future elections will be rigged still more securely.

The avowed Marxists of Black Lives Matter took time off from their many riots to join the cabal. We all know about the deep reverence communists have for free and fair elections.

Many [Black Lives Matter] organizers were part of Podhorzer’s network, from the activists in battleground states who partnered with the Democracy Defense Coalition to organizations with leading roles in the Movement for Black Lives. …

Black organizers also recruited thousands of poll workers to ensure polling places would stay open in their communities.

This calls to mind the 2008 election, when uniformed New Black Panther thugs wielding batons attempted to frighten Caucasians away from polling places. Charges were dropped by Obama’s Justice Department.

If Trump had prevailed following election day, the cabal was prepared to go to Plan B: street violence.

More than 150 liberal groups, from the Women’s March to the Sierra Club to Color of Change, from Democrats.com to the Democratic Socialists of America, joined the “Protect the Results” coalition. The group’s now defunct website had a map listing 400 planned postelection demonstrations, to be activated via text message as soon as Nov. 4.

The liberal establishment utilizes these maniacal moonbats as necessary, but even otherwise respectable people were involved.

About a week before Election Day, Podhorzer received an unexpected message: the U.S. Chamber of Commerce wanted to talk.

Businessmen sensibly wanted to avoid another wave of the leftist rioting that caused $2 billion in damage last year. Looks like some were willing to collaborate with leftists to ensure peace at any price.

“With tensions running high, there was a lot of concern about unrest around the election, or a breakdown in our normal way we handle contentious elections,” says Neil Bradley, the Chamber’s executive vice president and chief policy officer.

The Capitol Riot was the exception that proves the rule: leftists riot, not conservatives.

Virtually the entire establishment pitched in:

Fox News surprised everyone by calling Arizona for Biden. The public-awareness campaign had worked: TV anchors were bending over backward to counsel caution and frame the vote count accurately.

Fox News bent over backward, all right. It obviously called Arizona prematurely, to Biden’s benefit. Its viewership cratered afterward and may never fully recover.

Here’s why there were no leftist riots on election night, when it seemed likely that Trump would win:

“We wanted to be mindful of when was the right time to call for moving masses of people into the street,” [Angela Peoples of the Democracy Defense Coalition] says. As much as they were eager to mount a show of strength, mobilizing immediately could backfire…

So the word went out: stand down.

Let that sink in. Time Magazine just admitted that the only reason the people who installed Biden did not flood the streets with rioters on election night is that they thought it might backfire.

Read the whole piece (archived here if they take it down). It demonstrates that if leftists succeed in doing to America what they did to Venezuela, it will be because they were united, organized, and relentless. Resistance to them will be crushed if patriots do not show the same qualities.

On tips from Varla, ABC of the ANC, Occam’s Stubble, seaoh, Kirklesworth, and Mr. Freemarket.

How to Steal an Election

Maybe the reason the mainstream media won’t tell us what has been happening is that the events of this year are too monumental in their historic importance to wedge into a newscast between updates on Joe Biden’s socks and the scandalous misogyny of not pretending that his wife is a doctor. If so, the alphabet networks ought to run this video; it arguably sums up 2020 in just over a minute:

Looks like it really was easy. But as always with socialists, getting out from under these people will be much more difficult.

On tips from seaoh and Henry.

YouTube Bans Questioning 2020 Election

Google subsidiary YouTube shocked everyone who believes in the free flow of information with its stated policy of censoring videos deemed to contradict official statements of the CCP-dominated World Health Organization. If that could be topped, this does it:

The platform said that any video containing assertions that the 2020 election outcome was changed by “widespread fraud or errors” would get booted from the site unless “sufficient” context is provided.

The “sufficient context” loophole allows leftist propagandists to reference the massively documented 2020 election fraud in order to deny that it occurred.

Meanwhile, YouTube enjoys special legal protections as a “neutral” platform that does not have a point of view. Belligerently biased Big Tech propaganda platforms (Google, Facebook, Twitter) purchase this status from the corrupt federal government with campaign donations.

Facts that might be censored by YouTube include:

YouTube’s decision to censor content that suggests the election was fraudulently won comes as legal challenges over the election results are still working through the courts. The Trump campaign filed an extensive challenge to Georgia’s election results last week, pointing out enough instances of alleged fraud that the suit could overturn the presidential election in the state.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday against the battleground states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin arguing that the states should be blocked from voting in the electoral college over alleged violations of election law. … President Trump announced on Wednesday morning that the Trump administration would be joining the suit in support of Texas.

You don’t have to be a conservative; anyone with an interest in free and fair elections stands to get whacked with the censorship stick by Big Tech.

Under moonbat rule, we are not allowed to question even the most conspicuously dodgy elections once the preferred candidate has been declared the winner by his supporters. If this reminds you of a banana republic (definition #2), that could be because the Silicon Valley/Liberal Media/Democratic Party axis of evil is turning the USA into one.

Big Tech censorship is a one-way street.

On a tip from Mike_W20.

Chris Wallace Pushes the President-Elect Lie

No wonder the Fox News viewer base is enraged. Fox had to bring in a crisis management team in part because Chris Wallace’s debate “moderation” was ham-fistedly biased in favor of Joe Biden. Have they learned a lesson and reined in this rampaging moonbat? They have not:

While interviewing [Health and Human Services Secretary Alex] Azar on “Fox News Sunday,” Wallace interrupted Azar when the Health and Human Services secretary referred to Biden as the former vice president. …

“He’s the president-elect, sir,” Wallace interjected, referring to Biden. “He’s the president-elect.”

Refusing to be derailed by Wallace’s partisan sniping, Azar finished his remark on the topic of mask-wearing.

Once Azar had finished talking, however, Wallace chided him again.

“But first of all, it’s the President-Elect Joe Biden, Secretary Azar,” Wallace shot back.

Wallace must know as well as anyone that Joe Biden is not president-elect.

Electors from every state are scheduled to meet on Dec. 14 to officially cast their ballots for president and vice president. Congress will then meet on Jan. 6 to officially count the ballots, finalizing the electoral process.

If Biden has been named the winner at the end of this process, then despite or rather possibly due to rampant Democrat cheating, he will be president-elect. Until then he is not.

Biden himself pledged “not to declare victory until the election is independently certified” during the clown show of a debate presided over by Wallace. He promptly broke the promise.

Why does Wallace interject the president-elect lie so obnoxiously? The purpose is to undermine attempts to challenge the election on the grounds of fraud. The election is over, bark Wallace and colleagues; time to move on. They would like Republicans to concede, raising pressure on Trump to do so himself, before too much is learned about the way the election was conducted.

On a tip from Varla.