According to postmodern philosophy, objective reality is either nonexistent or irrelevant; all that matters is the artificial world we create with words. Consequently, leftists believe that ultimate power can be achieved through control of language. This is why updates to the Newspeak Dictionary come fast and furious. It is why you can tell that you have found a soft spot in leftist defenses when they react to certain words as if you had poked a raw nerve. Use the word “depravity” in a discussion with liberals about the LGBT agenda and you may see fireworks. The word “globalist” so betrays their agenda that they have resorted to playing the anti-Semitism card:

Following what many, such as Brexit leader Nigel [Farage], have described as a “globalist coup” to install former Goldman Sachs banker and World Economic Forum (WEF) acolyte Rishi Sunak as prime minister, left-wing figures have attempted to make the very term “globalist” an off-limits slur, claiming that it is antisemitic.

I didn’t realize Sunak is Jewish. He threw me off by taking his parliamentary oath of office on the Bhagavad Gita.

Acknowledgment that power-hungry supranational cabals like the World Economic Forum are globalist is allegedly “a common antisemitic trope based on conspiracy theories about international Jewish power,” according to professional offended Jewish person Marie van der Zyl.

The linguistic dispute came to a head on Sunday, when a caller to the LBC radio station echoed Mr Farage’s sentiments in describing Sunak as a “globalist” who “doesn’t seem to love England”.

Delete the word “globalist” from your copy of the Newspeak Dictionary at once, and remember that if you utter it, you are literally a Nazi.

On a tip from StephaneDumas.

In case the Stacey Abrams plan to cure inflation by killing your children doesn’t pan out, moonbats have another plan — eat insects:

Budget supermarket Aldi is considering selling edible insect recipe kits as the cost of living crisis hits families. …

Aldi is weighing up whether to stock products by Yum Bug, which make the insect recipe kits.

Yum Bug founders Aaron Thomas and Leo Taylor, both 28, are competing against other start-ups to get their product on the supermarket’s shelves.

Proclaims Thomas,

“We’re on a mission to change perceptions of insects as food… We want to take bug consumption mainstream..”

Fortuitously, this is in step with the Liberal World Order’s agenda. The idea is not so much to provide food that people can still afford despite their money having been rendered increasing worthless through inflation, as to save the planet from the imaginary climate menace. See the World Economic Forum for details.

On tips from Steve T and Franco.

The Liberal World Order — via mouthpieces like the World Economic Forum and the BBC — has made it clear that in utopia, the little people will eat insects to please the climate. As with the transsexual agenda, children are targeted, because they put up less resistance, not understanding what is being done to them.

They aren’t just feeding the bugs to African children anymore. Dutch kids have to eat them too:

Holland is the world’s #2 agricultural exporter after the USA. But that won’t last with the government shutting down farms for environmentalist reasons and to make room for refugee resettlement camps. Dutch cuisine of the future will consist of creepy-crawlies doled out by Big Government.

British schoolchildren will also find insects on the menu.

As you might guess, eating bugs is not good for your health. It is an effective way to contract parasites. But pleasing the climate is what counts.

The greater the sacrifice, the nicer the climate, per moonbat ideology. If making children eat insects doesn’t perfect the weather, we might try flinging them down volcanoes.

On tips from Chris Neilson and Folksy Grandpa Joe.

The fossil fuels that allow us to sustain the current population make it be too warm out, according to liberal doctrine. Zillionaire Tinseltowner Steven Spielberg says he is “terrified” of those who “go blithely through life” without worrying about their imaginary impact on the climate. Meanwhile:

Spielberg’s plane, a Gulfstream G650, has burned at least $116,159 worth of jet fuel over the course of 16 trips spanning nearly 17,000 miles since June 23, according to flight tracking data from ADS-B Exchange and compiled by the database Celebrity Jets. The figures are likely an underestimate since the database didn’t calculate fuel and distance metrics of at least three trips made by Spielberg’s jet.

If only the hypocrisy of our moonbat ruling class could be converted into energy, we would not need to offend them by burning fossil fuels.

Spielberg’s jet has emitted at least 179 tons of carbon dioxide over the last two months.

Imagine the fossil fuels required to keep his mansion at the perfect temperature.

No worries; Spielberg makes up for it by shoveling $millions at Democrats, who impose policies that drive up the cost of air travel and drive down the standard of living, making members of the deplorable middle class ever less able to afford flying coach and heating their homes. That makes Spielberg carbon neutral. If he had a chest, he would be entitled to puff it out in self-righteousness.

Fortunately, Spielberg’s massive carbon emissions will have no more effect on the planet than anyone else’s. “Global warming is a scientific reality. It’s not a political trick. It’s a true piece of real, measurable, quantifiable science,” bleats Spielberg. His lifestyle proves that even he knows this isn’t true.

Other posturing Hollyweirdos match his hypocrisy:

Leonardo DiCaprio went on multiple fossil fuel-powered trips over the last several years while pushing for extreme measures to combat climate change.

In 2016, DiCaprio reportedly flew 8,000 miles via private jet from Europe to New York City to accept an award for his environmental activism. He then returned to Europe for a charity event.

That same year, DiCaprio took a private jet to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland. At the summit, the WEF gave DiCaprio its Crystal Award for his “leadership in tackling the climate crisis.”

As noted at Not the Bee,

Perhaps we should stop listening to celebrities who get rich off playacting.

Spielberg preaches that “everybody has to be held responsible” for their personal role in the fictional climate change crisis. It would be more constructive to hold people responsible for elevating jackasses to positions of public prominence.

On a tip from Wiggins.

The earth’s climate has changed continuously for 4.5 billion years. This is not a problem. In contrast, overbearing maniacs of the World Economic Forum stripe who believe that the climate is a problem are a very serious problem:

If only James Bond or Austin Powers or somebody could put a stop to these schemes before moonbats manage to kill off life on earth in the name of an imaginary crisis.

On tips from Occam’s Stubble and KirklesWorth.

Moonbats create fanciful problems. They address them with fanciful solutions. Some want to rescue Boston from the imaginary global warming crisis with a “floating tutu.”

Contrary to the prognostications of their prophet Al Gore, the ice caps are not melting nor are the seas rising appreciably. Yet moonbats manage to believe that coastal cities will soon be submerged. So the Experts have proposed littering Boston’s shoreline with miniature offshore swamps.

From the Boston Globe:

The “Emerald Tutu” is a proposed system of floating vegetation mats that, when interconnected, could protect Boston’s shoreline from rising sea levels and coastal flooding. The tutu could also serve as a cosmetic attraction to Boston Harbor.

At least it might be less of an eyesore than nearly as useless offshore windfarms.

“In the long term, I want to see thousands and thousands of these units deployed in the harbor and buffering the shoreline like a giant sponge from the intense climate-driven storms that are inevitably coming our way,” said Gabriel Cira, a Massachusetts licensed architect and project lead for the tutu.

Someone needs to get word to Joe Biden that climate catastrophe is coming “inevitably” no matter what we do. Then he might bring down prices by allowing us to access our own oil, which unlike Saudi oil causes climate change according to Democrat doctrine.

Each individual unit of the tutu has a distinctive circular shape and is roughly seven feet in diameter, with marsh grasses decorating the floating tops and aquatic plants and seaweed attached to the submerged portion.

For maximum political correctness, they should be decorated with Black Lives Matter and LGBT pride flags.

The units are made of biodegradable materials including recycled wood, burlap canvas, and coconut fiber.

Because of course they are. In climate-compliant utopia, everything in our huts will be made of recycled garbage held together with coconut fiber.

Let’s hope the floating tutu costs taxpayers less than the $350,000 apiece electrification of Boston school buses, which was intended to prevent climate change and paid for with federal Covid funds.

The team is working to incorporate “climate justice” into the project’s plans, looking to earn support in communities where the issue of coastal flooding is most pressing.

As the World Economic Forum has informed us, global warming is more harmful for communities higher up on the Cultural Marxist pyramid of favor.

According to Cira, enabling climate justice in East Boston has been a goal for the tutu.

Whenever you see a modifier before the word “justice,” you know that the issue is not the issue; the issue is moonbattery for the sake of moonbattery.

On a tip from Jack D.

In case the agenda of the Liberal World Order isn’t clear, the World Economic Forum spells it out with predictions based on wishful thinking:

• You will own nothing and like it.

• America will be cut down to size.

• Meat will be an occasional treat (except for members of the ruling class, as in North Korea).

• Climate change will materialize as an actual problem justifying radical action.

• We will be displaced by “refugees.”

• We will be suppressed by taxes on the harmless CO2 that all human activity produces.

• We will be forbidden to use any fossil fuels, just like Joe Biden promised (after all, cavemen didn’t need cars or electricity).

• The misery social engineers create on earth will be extended into outer space (no doubt powered by wind turbines).

Smug in their bubbles of B.S., the Davos crowd expects people to embrace this bleak, oligarchical collectivist vision of the future:

On a tip from Wiggins.

Covid vaccines will not be the last mandatory medicine, not after Biden et al. turn over totalitarian control to the literal communists running the World Health Organization. How can our rulers be sure that we ingest whatever we are told?

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla has a solution. Pills will come with little chips that inform the authorities when we have consumed our medication as required:

If James Bond can take on SPECTRE, why won’t he do something about the World Economic Forum? The United Nations also requires his attention, and Pfizer might too.

On tips from Wiggins, R F, Dragon’s Lair, Stormfax, and Mr. Freemarket.

If the globalists comprising the World Economic Forum don’t make the hair stand up on the back of your neck, you probably haven’t heard of University of Jerusalem professor Yuval Harari:

Harari, an Israeli philosopher who serves as an advisor to the World Economic Forum (WEF), has frequently warned of a growing class of “useless people.” According to the WEF advisor, the rise of artificial intelligence will give rise to billions of “useless people” who humanity will have to “deal with.” In order to address the growing number of so-called “useless people”, Harari suggests keeping them docile with drugs and video games.

He forgot to mention Netflix.

The “useless people” referenced by the WEF advisor would be those who refuse to be injected with artificial intelligence capabilities in the coming decades. Describing humans as “hackable animals”, Harari believes that “the masses” would “not stand much of a chance” against these changes even if they were to organize.

Being Israeli, Harari must be aware of what past generations of authoritarians have done with those who didn’t fit into their contrived utopia. Nazis and Soviets called them “useless eaters.”

On a tip from ABC of the ANC.

World Economic Forum globalists actually refer to themselves as the “Elite,” as demonstrated in the video below featuring Ngaire Woods, Professor of Global Economic Governance at Oxford University, speaking at the WEF’s Great Narrative conference last November. She announces good news to her fellow aspiring world rulers: all being in cahoots with each other facilitates coordinated action across the world. The bad news is that in no part of the world are these malevolent moonbats trusted:

They can lead, but no one is dumb enough to follow — especially not after the way the DAISNAID hypocrites comprising the Elite exploited Covid to enrich themselves and set the stage for their dystopian Great Reset.

Paul Joseph Watson offers theories on why people may not trust our global overlords as they consolidate power:

On a tip from DM.

Not even Joe Biden of the 85-car climate motorcade could better personify the flagrant hypocrisy of the leftist ruling class better than Prince Charles:

Heir to the British throne Prince Charles called for a “vast military-style campaign” to combat climate change as he opened the COP26 summit in Glasgow on Monday.

Despite the climate having fluctuated wildly throughout the history of the planet, the temperature slightly rising as a result of leftist bureaucrats failing to impose sufficient taxation poses an “existential threat,” according to Prince Chucklehead.

Claiming that “time has quite literally run out”, the British royal said that as many countries in the world are unable to make the necessary investments into so-called green technologies, it will be up to richer nations to marshal “a vast military-style campaign” with “trillions at its disposal” to fight climate change.

If they devoted the $trillions to combating halitosis, at least some good might come of it.

The hoax is not just about confiscating our money. It is also about crushing freedom on a global level:

He argued that for this vision to work, it cannot be up to countries to create “parallel” solutions, but rather it is necessary to look towards a “global systems-level solution” in order to lead the “radical transforming of our current fossil fuel-based economy to one that is genuinely renewable and sustainable.”

When a moonbat barks about “radical transforming,” check your ammo supply to make sure it is ample.

The calls for a globalist solution are nothing new from Prince Charles, who was an early proponent of the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset agenda. In 2015 the prince argued that the global economy was in need of a “rewiring” in order to prevent a climate catastrophe.

Klaus Schwab chuckles ominously and strokes his Sphynx cat as John Kerry bobs his head in the background.

Like most of the hoity-toity moonbats attending the Glasgow summit, Chucklehead arrived by private jet.

It has been estimated that the emissions produced by globalists jetting into Glasgow will outweigh the entire emissions produced by the people of Scotland in an entire year.

Paul Joseph Watson has been fed to the teeth:

Gerry Baker did warn us to brace for hypocrisy:

Our masters’ doubletalk will be on full display in the next week or two at the COP26 climate summit, when politicians, chief executives and leaders of environmental groups will deliver their grave warnings about the sacrifices that must be made to save the planet from extinction.

The sanctimonious posturing by the rich and powerful not only accomplishes no good whatsoever, it inflicts great harm. Elitist phonies cannot control the climate, but they can make our lives miserable:

The higher costs of energy fall disproportionately on the poor and middle class, for whom it represents a sizable proportion of their total spending. For the laid-off coal miner in Appalachia or the family struggling to meet its heating bills in a freezing Midwestern winter, the climate demands we’ll hear so much about in the next few weeks have a much more immediate impact than for the proliferating crowd of well-heeled “ESG” investors.

The symbol of the ruling class is the pointlessly inefficient, eagle-chopping wind turbine. The symbol for the rest of us might come to be the guillotine.

On tips from KirklesWorth, seaoh, and Varla.

Moonbat social engineers at Doconomy and Mastercard have come up with a carbon limit credit card that fabricates a carbon emission score for everything you buy, then cuts off your spending when you have contributed too much imaginary eco-sin to the fictional global warming crisis. It has earned the globalist stamp of approval from the United Nations and the Bond villain Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum.

The next step, as detailed at the prestigious science journal Nature, is a mandatory personal carbon allowance that will “entail all adults receiving an equal, tradable carbon allowance that reduces over time in line with national targets.” When they have dwindled our consumption down to nothing, the mission will have been accomplished. As the WEF promises, we will own nothing, and we will be happy.

Actually, we will not be happy, but if all goes according to plan it won’t matter, because there won’t be much we can do about it.

Meanwhile, the John Kerry types who hope to impose these schemes can afford to buy carbon indulgences and carry on with their private jet lifestyle.

The effect on the allegedly problematic weather will be nil. As Paul Joseph Watson observes, this “has nothing to do with climate change, and everything to do with technocratic micromanagement and control of your life.”

Now that the financial services industry has gone full woke along with the rest of the establishment, this control might include basing credit scores on the political correctness of your browsing history.

The future of totalitarianism opens before us:

One way or another, they will have us eating bugs. Not because this will improve the weather, but because it will demonstrate graphically that the little people have been put in their place.

On a tip from KirklesWorth.

The Bond villains comprising the World Economic Forum aren’t the only ones to note the allegedly beneficial reduction of CO2 emissions that has resulted from the economy-crushing ChiCom virus lockdowns.

The Blaze reports:

Climate scientists said that the pandemic lockdown has led to a historic decrease in CO2 emissions, but added that the equivalent of a lockdown every two years would be needed to fulfill the Paris climate agreement.

Reentering that agreement was a priority from the beginning for Biden’s handlers, who aggressively oppose American interests in favor of globalism, leftist ideology, and the Great Reset.

The scientists did not recommend lockdowns every two years, but only that policy changes on the scale of a lockdown were necessary.

That is, crippling the economy to the extreme of the coronavirus lockdowns will be necessary.

The United States pulled out of the Paris Agreement in 2019 under the direction of former President Donald Trump. Critics of the climate agreement have noted that the goals of the pact appear to unfairly target the United States while allowing for other nations to pollute with few regulations.

We are back in it now, because elections have consequences, none of them good when Democrats win.

Fortunately, there is zero chance that the agreement will result in economic suppression sufficient to achieve the arbitrary CO2 goals that the experts are paid to pretend will improve the weather. Countries like China and India will continue to grow their economies at a healthy pace. Less fortunately, the same cannot be said about the USA, so long as it is ruled by people who do not mean it well.

On a tip from Mr. Freemarket.

One thing Big Government has learned from the coronavirus crisis is that we will tolerate far more repression than might have been expected. Even after the economic devastation wreaked with largely counterproductive lockdowns in states they controlled, Democrats were able to seize power nationally. They will use this power to apply their lessons.

Another lesson is that if COVID-19 was good for Democrats, an even bigger crisis will be better still. How about a crisis that threatens all life on earth according to liberal rhetoric?

That’s why Stephen L. Miller expects climate lockdowns:

Mariana Mazzucato, an author and a professor in innovative economics at the University of London, raised the prospect of climate lockdowns in MarketWatch last September:

‘Under a “climate lockdown”, governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently.’

The idea of ‘doing capitalism differently’ is the driving rhetorical motivation behind the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset (another term for the implementation of global Marxism).

Climate Czar John Kerry is a proponent of imposing the Great Reset fast and hard.

Karl Lauterbach, an MP for the German Social Democratic party wrote in Die Welt last December that ‘we need measures to deal with climate change that are similar to the restrictions on personal freedom [imposed] to combat the pandemic.’ How long before this theory makes its way into news outlets and politicians’ speeches here?

The suppression of economic activity in the name of the ChiCom virus caused a drop in supposedly harmful CO2 emissions. The globalist liberal ruling class has seized on this as evidence that economic suppression is good. Barks the World Economic Forum, “Emissions fell during lockdown. Let’s keep it that way.”

If we can all just stay home for two weeks (which would inevitably become four weeks), it’s worth it to save the planet. Anyone who questions such proposals will be labeled a science denier and accused of wanting to kill their fellow neighbors (you know, like what you hear if you don’t wear a mask for a casual walk around the block).

Temporary measures to address the imaginary crisis will become the new normal. Important people like John Kerry need to fly across the world on private jets to collect rewards, but why should we little people be allowed to fly at all when it might offend the climate?

Big Government could impose climate lockdowns…

…by declaring that climate change is an immediate public health and national security crisis, and using the same authority granted to them by public health departments to implement them under the same guidelines they did for COVID-19.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has called for Biden to declare a “climate emergency.” Prominent Democrats Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have introduced a bill that would force him to do so.

The amount of tyranny we will tolerate is the amount that will be inflicted by Democrats, no less.

Hat tip: PJ Media.