Important news for moonbats on the culture front. Stacey-Leigh Dolan will be the new chair of London’s Vagina Museum.

Proclaims Chairmoonbat Dolan:

“These are challenging times for the sector, and it will be a tough task to build resilience while delivering world-class, high-impact programming, but I am confident that the passionate and diverse team of staff and trustees will rise to the challenge.”

The Vagina Museum proclaims itself to be “the world’s first bricks and mortar museum dedicated to vaginas, vulvas and the gynaecological anatomy.”

See if you can guess the genitalia of Eugène Delacroissant (a.k.a. drag king Claire Mead), curator of the current exhibition Museum of Mankind.

Wouldn’t it be nice to have as much extra time to waste as moonbats seem to?

On a tip from Mike B.

To most of us, the election represents a glorious victory for America, which turned back at the edge of a precipice and can now restore itself to greatness. But to moonbats, it was a victory only for the identity group they most hate: white men. Watch and laugh as a New York moonbat takes vengeance against the patriarchy by disfiguring her appearance (LIBERAL LANGUAGE ALERT):

The 4B movement she refers to has been trending on social media after the failure of the Kamala Harris campaign, which made a feminist pitch to vote for a lousy candidate out of hostility toward men. The four B’s stand for its four tenets, which all start with a B sound in Korean: no dating men, no sex with men, no marrying men, and no giving birth. The movement benefits men more than women, as it helps them avoid neurotic women of a type likely to ruin their lives.

The charming lady in the video above adds that she won’t even talk to men anymore. Trump said we would get tired of winning, but I’m not tired yet.

Don’t let liberal women in on the secret that they can strike a still more devastating blow against the patriarchy if after they shave off their hair they tattoo “DYSFUNCTIONAL MOONBAT” across their foreheads.

On tips from DCGere, R F, and Dr. Kufi Tutite.

Social engineers oppose the traditional family arrangement that has worked so well since before recorded history, whereby women raise children and maintain the home rather than slaving to generate tax revenue. They have determined that it is oppressive because it requires cognitive effort:

[T]here’s an invisible dimension of household labor that unfolds behind the scenes: the cognitive effort that goes into anticipating needs, planning, organizing and delegating household tasks. In other words, someone has to remember to replace the dish soap and select which vegetables to chop.

Our new research found that this cognitive dimension of housework, often called the “mental load,” is divided even more unevenly within couples than the physical dimension – and it seems to take a particular mental health toll on women. According to the study we published in the Archives of Women’s Mental Health, mothers who take on a more disproportionate share of cognitive household labor report higher levels of depression, stress, relationship dissatisfaction and burnout.

Some women lack the cognitive capacity to laugh off the Experts and their woke studies. Admittedly, it could be in the best interests of the gene pool if they sit in cubicles avoiding overtaxation of their brains instead of having kids.

On a tip from Mike B.

Democrats are counting on voters selecting the next president based largely on gender. Why not fund scientific research on the same principle?

Via Physics World:

Investments in “big-science” projects, whether it’s the next particle collider or a new synchrotron, are often justified in terms of the benefits for science, such as the discovery of a new particle or the opening of a new vista on the cosmos. The positive impact of large facilities on society and the economy are often cited too, such as spin-off technologies in medical physics. Gender equality, however, is rarely acknowledged as a necessary objective when building these multi-billion-euro facilities or investing in the research required to develop them. That lack of focus on gender equality is something that I believe must change.

In all seriousness, this is from a science magazine, not the editorial page of a second-rate college newspaper. Moonbattery is a truly totalitarian ideology; there is no escape from it anywhere.

The lack of gender-based targets for big science is laid bare in a tool created as part of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 funding programme. Produced by the Research Infrastructure Impact Assessment Pathways project, it assesses the impact of research infrastructures on the economy and society via 122 “impact indicators” in four areas: human resources; policy; society; and economy and innovation. But only one indicator – contribution to gender balance in society – gives any mention to gender equality.

A cultural Marxist may well pout. But there is hope:

The EU’s €96bn Horizon Europe programme – the successor to Horizon 2020 – now requires that all benefiting organizations, many of which participate in big-science projects, have a gender equality plan. Several industry sectors are also doing lots to integrate equality, diversity and inclusion into human resources…

When scientific funding is specifically targeted toward research conducted by blacks with Down syndrome, the scientific community can congratulate itself on having caught up to the makers of Barbi — except that by then Mattel will have pushed political correctness even deeper into self-parody.

In the meantime, Physics World calls for “gender budgeting,” which entails discrimination against men in hiring, pay equity, and budgets that are “earmarked to help staff achieve a work–life balance.”

Mandating the same pay for less work is known among moonbats as “social justice.” To get an idea of how likely this mentality is to produce excellence, consider who the Democrats are running for president.

On a tip from Lyle.

The New York City fad of punching random white or Asian women in the face turns out not to be a consequence of liberal lawlessness and Black Lives Matter race hate ideology after all. Salon’s Amanda Marcotte reveals that once again Donald Trump is to blame — or rather the misogyny of his supporters.

Mind your ears; Amanda has a tendency to shriek. Here she goes, via The Blaze:

These stories resonate, as well, because the nation is having a moment of increasingly unhinged male fury at women for daring to have lives that are centered around something other than catering to a man’s every whim. Unleashed by Donald Trump and the MAGA movement, there’s an upswell of loud male entitlement shouting at us from every corner.

Deplorable MAGA types prowl the streets of ultraliberal NYC, just like in Chicago, where a pair of them set upon Jussie Smollett for being black and gay.

Everything that ever happens anywhere can be forced to fit into the liberal narrative; you just have to apply some intellectual elbow grease.

When countermoonbats responded to Amanda with guffaws…

…Amanda seized upon this as proof that she is oppressed by the male chauvinists comprising the patriarchy:

“Man, I knew this article was super true when I wrote it, but the hateful emails MAGA men are sending doubly prove it. Hit dogs, as they say, holler,” she said on social media.

“Oh men, just know that your angry emails are going unread. If I see a man’s name on the email and a mention of punching women, I know what you’re going to say and will delete without a read,” she added.

Only by firmly closing your ears to dissenting opinion can you achieve pure moonbattery.

On a tip from Wiggins.

You don’t have to be young and beautiful to be a beauty queen these days. It’s enough to be a foreigner and a moonbat activist like Apameh Schönauer, the new Miss Germany.

Her qualifications, other than being from an Islamic hellhole:

She is actively involved in social activism, including founding the women’s rights organization “Network Shirzan.”

Apameh Schönauer is of course in favor of the cultural genocide by mass immigration that she personifies, barking,

“I think Germany needs to open its arms a little wider and allow us to become more diverse.”

She is 39 years old and the mother of two. The honorific “Miss” doesn’t mean what it used to.

The liberal establishment grants awards on the basis of advancing its ideology. Another recent example is journalist/terrorist Yousef Masoud winning a Polk Award for journalism participating in the terror atrocities of October 7. Consequently, awards are no longer meaningful. If anything, receiving an award proves that you did not deserve it; otherwise moonbats could not have made a political point by giving it to you.

Hat tip: Allah’s Willing Executioners.

Rape is endemic in the Rainbow Utopia, as previously flourishing South African disintegrates into a pre-civilization state of barbarism due to the triumph of moonbattery. How do women feel about it? Let’s see if potential rapists know. Britain’s Ross Kemp asks the previously oppressed:

In the case of female moonbats, these sociopaths may actually have a point. If they are not willing at some sick level to become victims of rape, why do they support the societal disintegration that makes sexual violence inevitable? Maybe this explains feminist support for Hamas rapists.

On a tip from R F.

Women are not faring well in the leftist pecking order. When they aren’t getting raped and murdered by Hamas with feminist approval, they are getting displaced by cross-dressing men — even in women’s organizations:

Women’s rights groups have written in opposition to a decision by UN Women UK to have a transgender woman as its “UK champion”.

They have voiced their “dismay and disappointment” following the decision to select Munroe Bergdorf, 36, a model and broadcaster, to take on the role in November.

Nice to see some women’s rights groups still support women. Other ostensibly feminist groups have been subordinated to the greater liberal agenda, which calls for the sacrifice of women to terrorist savages and male perverts.

UN Women UK works in support of UN Women in a bid to transform the lives of women and girls along with “empowerment of women equality globally within civil society, government and the corporate sector”.

It empowers women by displacing them and by advancing the LGBT objective of canceling the very concept of women. What do you expect from the United Nations?

Mr. Bergdorf drones that he will “draw attention to the systemic and social impact of misogyny, transphobia and gender-based inequality within the UK.”

He is a fierce opponent not only of transphobia but also of Caucasians. Bergdorf is about as British as he is female. From 2020:

Bergdorf has rejoined L’Oreal Paris after [he] was sacked by the brand in 2017 for posting about “the racial violence of white people”. …

[He] will now join the company’s UK diversity and inclusion advisory board.

Bergdorf temporarily got the boot by shouting that “ALL white people” are guilty of racial violence. He proclaimed that whites’ “entire existence is drenched in racism.” Among the politically orthodox, to accuse someone of racism is the worst possible insult.

Naturally L’Oreal caved to the Powers That Be by bringing Bergdorf back on. If being a left-wing black woman is qualification enough to be Vice President, a Supreme Court Justice, White House Press Secretary, and until this week President of Harvard, surely being a left-wing black transsexual is qualification enough to represent beauty products — as well as women’s organizations like UN Women UK.

On tips from Franco and ABC of the ANC.

If feminists were going to be reasonable about anything, it ought to be Islam, which has treated women as subhuman from the beginning. In the early days of Mohammad’s cult, a primary recruiting tool was the distribution of booty from the caravans it looted — including women who were captured as sex slaves. To this day, Islamic regimes repress women to such an extreme that they are forbidden to show their hair and in some places even their faces. Yet in the aftermath of October 7, feminist groups side with Islam:

After Hamas terrorists set about murdering, raping and abducting as many women as they could, one might have expected widespread condemnation from the West’s feminist groups. After all, Hamas had provided enough evidence of its crimes — within hours, they were posting footage of abducted young women in bloodied trousers being paraded around Gaza.

Not to mention that women’s Achilles tendons were slit so they couldn’t run away before getting gang raped.

The response among the majority of groups committed to ending violence against women and girls (VAWG) was threefold: to keep quiet, to disbelieve the victims, or to insinuate they deserved their fate. In the words of 140 American “prominent feminist scholars”, to stand in solidarity with Israeli women is to give in to “colonial feminism”.

In Liberalese, “colonial” means “pertaining to Western Civilization.”

The British feminist group Feministo has no evident issue with Islam but plenty of problems with all things “colonial” — including the existence of Israel. A demonstration demanding its surrender to terrorists who want the country erased shut down London’s Liverpool Street Station.

Afterwards, the charity issued a 600-word statement, filled with references to “apartheid”, “genocide” and disproved reports that the IDF had bombed Gaza’s Al-Ahli hospital. There was no mention, however, of the 239 abducted Israelis, roughly 100 of whom are believed to be women, or the sexual assaults that took place on October 7. When journalist Hadley Freeman pointed out this wasn’t terribly feminist of them, the group responded by claiming reports of Hamas’s sex attacks amounted to “the Islamophobic and racist weaponisation of sexual violence”. Towards the end of their rambling statement, they concluded: “no people would ever accept being murdered, humiliated, dispossessed, racially targeted, oppressed, cleansed, exiled and colonised without resisting.”

Murder isn’t murder if committed by a favored group against colonial women and children, who are the real murderers according to moonbat ideology.

The horrors inflicted on women on October 7 are well documented. Progressives dismiss the documentation as Israeli propaganda. Believe all women, unless it conflicts with the agenda.

Other feminist groups openly siding with Hamas terrorists in the aftermath of the nightmare last month include Southall Black Sisters, Women for Women UK, Women’s Place UK, and UN Women.

The testimony of Nachman Dyksztejna regarding the Islamic atrocities clarifies what feminists are siding with:

“In Kibbutz Be’eri, I witnessed bodies of two women with their hands and legs tied to a bed. One of these bodies we found was sexually terrorised with a knife stuck in her vagina and all her internal organs removed. After brutally violating these women, Hamas detonated the house on them, so we found them beneath a pile of stones.

“The mini shelters scattered from the Nova party site to road 34, shelters that had been broken into, were filled with piles of women. Their clothing was torn on the upper part, but their bottoms were completely naked. Piles and piles of women, dead bodies, lying this way. When you took a closer look at their heads, you saw a single shot straight to the brain of each.”

The scene makes a good metaphor for what leftists want done to all of us for being “colonial.”

None of this sounds very empowering for women. But then, feminists don’t care any more about women than climate kooks care about the weather or Black Lives Matter fellow travelers care about the welfare of blacks.

The issue is never the issue; the issue is always the destruction of civilization so that it can be replaced by a regime of inescapable moonbattery. Like feminism, Islam makes for a useful wrecking ball.

Hat tip: Maggie’s Farm.

Only recently, women still had such a place of prominence in the Cultural Marxist totem pole of oppression that #MeToo mania was able to destroy any number of lives, even among moonbats (e.g., Al Franken, Charlie Rose). But then social engineers were forced to choose between women and transsexuals. Consequently, women are getting a taste of the contempt and demonization normally reserved for men.

Ninety-pound anti-Constitution activist David Hogg even blames suburban white women for gun violence. Squeaks Hogg:

“We will never end gun violence until white women in the suburbs stop voting for the Republicans who are endangering our schools and communities by flooding them with guns.”

True enough, any woman living in a house with numerous means of ingress, near an urban area, would be foolish not to have a gun in the house — preferably an AR-15, which is an idea weapon for female home defense, given its easy handling and high capacity.

Even the National Organization for Women has turned on women:

“Trans women are women,” the organization said on Facebook Monday morning.

That is to say, there is no such thing as a woman in any meaningful sense. A male pervert mocking women by dressing up as one as if for Halloween is as much a woman as a woman is.

Comments on the NOW post that do not comply with official pro-transsexual, anti-woman ideology are apparently getting deleted.

Feminism was once the primary wrecking ball used to destroy traditional values. But it has largely served its purpose. Social engineers have moved on, confirming that the issue is never the issue; the issue is always the revolution from above. Now even the largest feminist organization in the USA is no longer feminist but rather LGBTist.

When women are as disfavored as men, equality between the sexes will have been achieved at last.

On tips from Barry A and Bluto.

No matter what heights of power they attain, allegedly marginalized members of the Cultural Marxist coalition will never admit they are not oppressed. On the contrary, the more victimhood works, the more it will be brandished. Barack Obama was made president mainly for being black; we were rewarded with the politicized racial animus that soon degenerated into Black Lives Matter. In Iceland, a woman is prime minister. Katrin Jakobsdóttir was not on the job Tuesday; she was on strike to protest being oppressed:

The prime minister of Iceland went on strike Tuesday in protest of gender discrimination.

Would Jakobsdóttir admit she isn’t oppressed if they made her Queen of Iceland? She would not.

The main grievance:

Women in Iceland earn approximately 10% less on average compared to their male counterparts, according to the World Economic Forum.

The WEF also tells us that we must eat larvae to please the climate and that we will own nothing and be happy.

Apparently Iceland has no real problems, so Jakobsdóttir focuses on a crisis that does not exist:

The widely debunked theory of a gender pay gap supposes that men and women earn the same amount of money for doing the exact same work. Total earnings often show a difference between genders without factoring in work hours, profession, or time lapses in a career.

Given that men tend to work more hours, gravitate to more remunerative professions, take fewer extended absences, et cetera, the miniscule 10% wage gap in Iceland suggests that women are being paid more for the same work compared to men.

Iceland consistently ranks at the top of equality indexes, however, including at the World Economic Forum where Jakobsdóttir wrote an article in 2017 boasting the country’s gender successes.

Maybe Iceland has a real problem after all. Its prime minister is in league with a sinister globalist cabal. She is listed as a WEF “agenda contributor.”

In 2020, the Icelandic leader said that in regard to “rebuilding and reimagining societies after COVID-19,” it was crucial to keep “gender & racial equality, democracy & social justice at the forefront.”

“Democracy” and “social justice” are ominous terms coming from Klaus Schwab acolytes.

At least Jakobsdóttir can explain away statistics showing the wage gap to be a load of crap. The algorithms were designed by men, who are sexists:

On a tip from R F.

George Orwell predicted where leftist politics would take us with such uncanny precision that it would be surprising if he did not foresee his own cancelation:

George Orwell was a “sadistic, misogynistic, homophobic, sometimes violent” man who wrote women out of his story, according to a biographer of his wife.

Anna Funder even implies that Orwell was homosexual, despite also denouncing him as a homophobe.

“So he’s a very complicated man. He’s sadistic, misogynistic, homophobic, sometimes violent, and also brilliant,” she told an audience at the Cheltenham Literature Festival while promoting the book Wifedom: Mrs Orwell’s Invisible [L]ife.

Nice of her to admit that Orwell was brilliant, but that’s not enough to save a misogynist from getting canceled — or as Orwell would put it in 1984, vaporized and consigned to the memory hole, so that it is as if the disfavored person had never existed.

Evidence for Orwell’s heinousness can be found right in the pages of his most famous book:

“[W]riting a book like 1984, which is violent, misogynist, sadistic, grim, paranoid: that comes out of a writer’s flaws. …

“A decent, everyman underdog, the ordinary person that he might have wanted to be, would not have had those visions.”

If you see bad things coming, that proves you are a bad person.

As for the misogyny allegation,

“In his work he absolutely ignores women. He’s a misogynist.”

Julia is a central character in 1984. But it was misogynistic not to make her the main protagonist. This political defect has been corrected:

Wifedom is not the only book this year to reassess Orwell through a feminist lens. Sandra Newman has written Julia, which retells 1984 through the eyes of its main female character.

The only way Orwell can escape vaporization is for all of his work to be rewritten to comply with the ideology of the liberal establishment, just as Winston Smith rewrote old newspaper articles to comply with the current doctrine of Ingsoc.

On a tip from The Great Cornholio.

Dylan Mulvaney’s outlandishly lucrative act is a vicious parody of womanhood. The liberal establishment is in on it:

If this guy is a woman, as the media demands we pretend, then women do not exist in any meaningful sense. Our rulers cannot define the word “woman” because women are undergoing cancelation.

Members of the Cultural Marxist coalition had best beware. Women were charter members, back when feminism was the primary wrecking ball used by social engineers to smash cornerstones of civilization like marriage, masculinity, and sexual morals. But now that liberals have moved on to LGBTism, women are discarded, having served their purpose. The same could happen to other identity groups that currently enjoy cherished “oppressed” status.

On a tip from Jester.